What’s My Rep Doing

Last sync: Oct 30, 2026, 11:56 PM UTC

Members

P000145

Alex Padilla

DemocraticCaliforniaCurrent Member
Sponsored
114
Cosponsored
696
Birth Year
1973

Stated Priorities & Legislative Record

Congress 119 · Automated analysis

Reviewed comparisons point both waysAll topics

511 reviewed comparisons · 184 scored · 178 measures

Comparison balance
+1.2/ 2
Supportive
180
Mixed
3
Opposing
1
Unscored
327

Civil Rights

Sponsored
3
Cosponsored
26
Linked House votes
0

What they say Official statements

Expand and preserve voting rights.

Stated commitment

“That’s why he’s spent his career fighting to expand and preserve voting rights.”

Alex Padilla U.S. Senator for California · Captured 2026-10-28

Protect the civil rights of all Americans.

Stated commitment

“And because Alex believes in an America made stronger by its diversity, he’s consistently fought to protect the civil rights of all Americans.”

Alex Padilla U.S. Senator for California · Captured 2026-10-28

Protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.

Stated commitment

“As a cosponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, Alex is fighting to protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.”

Alex Padilla U.S. Senator for California · Captured 2026-10-28

Protect a patient's right to travel freely between states to access care.

Stated commitment

“While Republican-led state legislatures work to strip away reproductive rights, he’s also fighting to protect a patient’s right to travel freely between states to access care.”

Alex Padilla U.S. Senator for California · Captured 2026-10-28

Take bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.

Stated commitment

“As the radical right wing of the Supreme Court strips away the rights of Americans, Alex believes we need bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.”

Alex Padilla U.S. Senator for California · Captured 2026-10-28

What they do Legislative evidence

SRES 615 · A resolution celebrating Black History Month.

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.

The cited action is cosponsorship of a resolution celebrating Black History Month, which does not contain any substantive provision about abortion access. The supplied passages only discuss commemorating Black History Month and honoring contributions/pursuing liberty and justice generally, so there is no direct policy mechanism supporting or opposing protecting access to abortion services throughout the United States.

“As a cosponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, Alex is fighting to protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Expand and preserve voting rights.

The cosponsored item is a resolution celebrating Black History Month. The supplied passages describe recognition and commemoration of African American contributions and a general call to move forward with liberty and justice for all, but they do not specifically address voting rights, election access, voter protections, registration, or similar mechanisms to expand or preserve voting rights. Because the action is only a symbolic resolution and the text contains no direct voting-rights policy content, a defensible comparison cannot be made.

“That’s why he’s spent his career fighting to expand and preserve voting rights.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Insufficient evidenceCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect the civil rights of all Americans.

The cosponsorship is of a resolution celebrating Black History Month, which generally affirms recognition and commemoration. However, the supplied passages do not contain any specific civil-rights policy mechanism, legal protection, enforcement, or rights-expanding provision. On this record, the action is too ceremonial and broad to reliably compare to the stated goal of protecting the civil rights of all Americans.

“And because Alex believes in an America made stronger by its diversity, he’s consistently fought to protect the civil rights of all Americans.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“This resolution recognizes Black History Month as an opportunity to reflect on U.S. history and to commemorate the contributions of African Americans.”
“It calls for the United States to (1) honor the contribution of pioneers who helped to ensure its legacy; and (2) move forward as a nation "indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect a patient's right to travel freely between states to access care.

The stated policy goal is about protecting a patient's right to travel across state lines to access care. The action is cosponsoring a resolution celebrating Black History Month, which is a commemorative resolution and does not address interstate travel, access to care, or reproductive rights. The supplied passages only discuss reflection on U.S. history, honoring African American contributions, and a general liberty-and-justice phrase, so there is no direct policy connection.

“While Republican-led state legislatures work to strip away reproductive rights, he’s also fighting to protect a patient’s right to travel freely between states to access care.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Take bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.

The stated policy goal is to take bold congressional action to protect a basic freedom, but the action here is a cosponsorship of a resolution celebrating Black History Month. The resolution passages describe recognition and commemoration of African American contributions and a general call to move forward with liberty and justice for all. That is a broad symbolic statement, not a direct substantive policy mechanism protecting a specific freedom, so a defensible comparison cannot be made.

“As the radical right wing of the Supreme Court strips away the rights of Americans, Alex believes we need bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“This resolution recognizes Black History Month as an opportunity to reflect on U.S. history and to commemorate the contributions of African Americans.”
Official summary source
S 3243 · Ending Forced Arbitration of Race Discrimination Act of 2025

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.

The stated policy goal is to protect access to abortion services throughout the United States. The cited action is cosponsorship of a bill about forced arbitration in race discrimination disputes. That bill does not address abortion access, reproductive health, or related legal protections, so there is no direct substantive connection to the specific policy goal.

“As a cosponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, Alex is fighting to protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Expand and preserve voting rights.

The stated priority is to expand and preserve voting rights. The cosponsored bill concerns race discrimination disputes and forced arbitration, not election administration, ballot access, voter eligibility, or other voting-rights mechanisms. This is at most an adjacent civil-rights action, but the supplied text does not provide a direct substantive connection to voting rights.

“That’s why he’s spent his career fighting to expand and preserve voting rights.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Ending Forced Arbitration of Race Discrimination Act of 2025 This bill prohibits a predispute arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver from being valid or enforceable with respect to a case relating to a race discrimination dispute at the election of the person alleging the discrimination.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Strongly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect the civil rights of all Americans.

The cosponsored bill directly advances the stated goal of protecting civil rights by making predispute arbitration agreements and joint-action waivers unenforceable in race discrimination disputes, preserving access to civil-rights enforcement for people alleging race discrimination. That is a direct substantive support for protecting civil rights, though limited to one category of discrimination rather than all civil rights generally.

“And because Alex believes in an America made stronger by its diversity, he’s consistently fought to protect the civil rights of all Americans.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Ending Forced Arbitration of Race Discrimination Act of 2025 This bill prohibits a predispute arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver from being valid or enforceable with respect to a case relating to a race discrimination dispute at the election of the person alleging the discrimination.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect a patient's right to travel freely between states to access care.

The stated policy goal is to protect a patient's right to travel freely between states to access care, which is specifically about interstate access to medical services. The cosponsored bill concerns forced arbitration in race discrimination disputes and does not address travel, interstate medical access, or reproductive care. Because the action is unrelated to the specific policy mechanism in the quotation, a defensible comparison cannot be made.

“While Republican-led state legislatures work to strip away reproductive rights, he’s also fighting to protect a patient’s right to travel freely between states to access care.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Ending Forced Arbitration of Race Discrimination Act of 2025 This bill prohibits a predispute arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver from being valid or enforceable with respect to a case relating to a race discrimination dispute at the election of the person alleging the discrimination.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Take bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.

The cosponsorship meaningfully supports the stated goal of taking bold congressional action to protect a basic freedom, because the bill would prohibit forced arbitration clauses in race discrimination disputes, preserving access to court for affected individuals. However, the match is narrower than the broad statement: it addresses one specific context (race discrimination disputes) rather than protecting the freedom in a general or comprehensive way.

“As the radical right wing of the Supreme Court strips away the rights of Americans, Alex believes we need bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Ending Forced Arbitration of Race Discrimination Act of 2025 This bill prohibits a predispute arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver from being valid or enforceable with respect to a case relating to a race discrimination dispute at the election of the person alleging the discrimination.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“Ending Forced Arbitration of Race Discrimination Act of 2025 This bill prohibits a predispute arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver from being valid or enforceable with respect to a case relating to a race discrimination dispute at the election of the person alleging the discrimination.”
Official summary source
S 2912 · Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.

The stated policy goal is protecting access to abortion services nationwide, but the cited cosponsored bill concerns deceptive communications, voter intimidation, and election integrity. It does not address abortion access or reproductive health services, so no meaningful connection to the specific policy goal can be made from the supplied passages.

“As a cosponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, Alex is fighting to protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025 This bill generally prohibits deceptive communications and voter interference regarding federal elections.”
“Specifically, the bill prohibits any person, within 60 days before a federal election, from communicating, causing to be communicated, or producing for communication certain information on voting, if the person (1) knows such information to be materially false, and (2) has the intent to impede or prevent another person from voting in an election.”
“Additionally, the bill prohibits any person, within 60 days before a federal election, from using an artificial intelligence system to produce certain information on voting, if the person has the intent to use the system to (1) produce false information, and (2) impede or prevent another person from voting in an election.”
“The bill also prohibits hindering, interfering with, or preventing voting or registering to vote.”
“A private right of action for preventive relief is established for persons aggrieved by violations of these prohibitions.”
“Criminal penalties are also established for violations. If the Department of Justice (DOJ) receives a credible report that materially false information has been or is being communicated in violation of the prohibitions on deceptive communications, and state and local election officials have not adequately communicated corrected information, then DOJ must communicate to the public accurate information designed to correct the materially false information.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Strongly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Expand and preserve voting rights.

The cosponsored bill directly advances the stated goal of expanding and preserving voting rights by prohibiting deceptive communications, voter interference, and intimidation that could prevent people from voting or from having votes processed and certified. Its mechanism is protective: it targets materially false election-related communications and interference with voting, and it adds remedies and enforcement to deter those practices.

“That’s why he’s spent his career fighting to expand and preserve voting rights.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025 This bill generally prohibits deceptive communications and voter interference regarding federal elections.”
“Specifically, the bill prohibits any person, within 60 days before a federal election, from communicating, causing to be communicated, or producing for communication certain information on voting, if the person (1) knows such information to be materially false, and (2) has the intent to impede or prevent another person from voting in an election.”
“Additionally, the bill prohibits any person, within 60 days before a federal election, from using an artificial intelligence system to produce certain information on voting, if the person has the intent to use the system to (1) produce false information, and (2) impede or prevent another person from voting in an election.”
“The bill also prohibits hindering, interfering with, or preventing voting or registering to vote.”
“A private right of action for preventive relief is established for persons aggrieved by violations of these prohibitions.”
“Criminal penalties are also established for violations. If the Department of Justice (DOJ) receives a credible report that materially false information has been or is being communicated in violation of the prohibitions on deceptive communications, and state and local election officials have not adequately communicated corrected information, then DOJ must communicate to the public accurate information designed to correct the materially false information.”

Opposing provisions

“The bill extends the prohibition on certain types of intimidation in federal elections to also prohibit intimidation for processing ballots or tabulating, canvassing, or certifying votes.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect a patient's right to travel freely between states to access care.

The stated priority is protecting a patient's right to travel between states to access care, especially reproductive care. The cosponsored bill concerns deceptive communications, voter intimidation, and election interference in federal elections. It does not address interstate travel or access to medical care, so there is no direct substantive connection to the specific policy goal.

“While Republican-led state legislatures work to strip away reproductive rights, he’s also fighting to protect a patient’s right to travel freely between states to access care.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025 This bill generally prohibits deceptive communications and voter interference regarding federal elections.”
“Specifically, the bill prohibits any person, within 60 days before a federal election, from communicating, causing to be communicated, or producing for communication certain information on voting, if the person (1) knows such information to be materially false, and (2) has the intent to impede or prevent another person from voting in an election.”
“Additionally, the bill prohibits any person, within 60 days before a federal election, from using an artificial intelligence system to produce certain information on voting, if the person has the intent to use the system to (1) produce false information, and (2) impede or prevent another person from voting in an election.”
“The bill also prohibits hindering, interfering with, or preventing voting or registering to vote.”
“A private right of action for preventive relief is established for persons aggrieved by violations of these prohibitions.”
“Criminal penalties are also established for violations. If the Department of Justice (DOJ) receives a credible report that materially false information has been or is being communicated in violation of the prohibitions on deceptive communications, and state and local election officials have not adequately communicated corrected information, then DOJ must communicate to the public accurate information designed to correct the materially false information.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect the civil rights of all Americans.

The cosponsored bill would advance civil rights in the election context by prohibiting deceptive communications, voter intimidation, and interference with voting or registration in federal elections. That meaningfully supports protecting Americans’ civil rights, but the match is narrower than the broad stated goal because the bill is limited to election-related conduct and does not comprehensively address all civil rights issues.

“And because Alex believes in an America made stronger by its diversity, he’s consistently fought to protect the civil rights of all Americans.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025 This bill generally prohibits deceptive communications and voter interference regarding federal elections.”
“Specifically, the bill prohibits any person, within 60 days before a federal election, from communicating, causing to be communicated, or producing for communication certain information on voting, if the person (1) knows such information to be materially false, and (2) has the intent to impede or prevent another person from voting in an election.”
“Additionally, the bill prohibits any person, within 60 days before a federal election, from using an artificial intelligence system to produce certain information on voting, if the person has the intent to use the system to (1) produce false information, and (2) impede or prevent another person from voting in an election.”
“The bill also prohibits hindering, interfering with, or preventing voting or registering to vote.”
“A private right of action for preventive relief is established for persons aggrieved by violations of these prohibitions.”
“Criminal penalties are also established for violations. If the Department of Justice (DOJ) receives a credible report that materially false information has been or is being communicated in violation of the prohibitions on deceptive communications, and state and local election officials have not adequately communicated corrected information, then DOJ must communicate to the public accurate information designed to correct the materially false information.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Take bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.

The stated goal is broad congressional action to protect a basic freedom, and this cosponsorship meaningfully advances that goal by backing a bill aimed at preventing deceptive election communications, voter interference, and intimidation. The bill directly protects voting access and election integrity through prohibitions on materially false voting information intended to impede voting, AI-generated deceptive voting information, and interference with voting or registration. The support is narrower than the quoted goal because it addresses a specific election-related freedom rather than a general, across-the-board freedom-protection measure.

“As the radical right wing of the Supreme Court strips away the rights of Americans, Alex believes we need bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025 This bill generally prohibits deceptive communications and voter interference regarding federal elections.”
“Specifically, the bill prohibits any person, within 60 days before a federal election, from communicating, causing to be communicated, or producing for communication certain information on voting, if the person (1) knows such information to be materially false, and (2) has the intent to impede or prevent another person from voting in an election.”
“Additionally, the bill prohibits any person, within 60 days before a federal election, from using an artificial intelligence system to produce certain information on voting, if the person has the intent to use the system to (1) produce false information, and (2) impede or prevent another person from voting in an election.”
“The bill also prohibits hindering, interfering with, or preventing voting or registering to vote.”
“The bill extends the prohibition on certain types of intimidation in federal elections to also prohibit intimidation for processing ballots or tabulating, canvassing, or certifying votes.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“The bill also prohibits hindering, interfering with, or preventing voting or registering to vote.”
Official summary source
SRES 408 · A resolution recognizing September 20, 2025, as "National LGBTQ+ Servicemembers and Veterans Day".

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Expand and preserve voting rights.

The stated policy goal is to expand and preserve voting rights, but the cited action is cosponsoring a resolution recognizing National LGBTQ+ Servicemembers and Veterans Day and urging health-care access for transgender servicemembers and veterans. That is a separate subject and does not directly advance or oppose voting rights.

“That’s why he’s spent his career fighting to expand and preserve voting rights.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“This resolution recognizes September 20, 2025, as National LGBTQ+ Servicemembers and Veterans Day and celebrates the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer servicemembers and veterans who have served in the Armed Forces.”
“Additionally, the resolution (1) regrets the harm done to such servicemembers and veterans under policies that discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and (2) urges the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense to ensure transgender veterans and servicemembers and their families have access to a full range of health care.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.

The stated policy goal is protecting access to abortion services throughout the United States. The cosponsored resolution is a commemorative measure about National LGBTQ+ Servicemembers and Veterans Day, with a general call to ensure transgender veterans and servicemembers have access to a full range of health care. It does not specifically address abortion access, abortion services, or abortion policy, so there is no direct connection to the claimed goal.

“As a cosponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, Alex is fighting to protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Additionally, the resolution (1) regrets the harm done to such servicemembers and veterans under policies that discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and (2) urges the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense to ensure transgender veterans and servicemembers and their families have access to a full range of health care.”

Opposing provisions

“This resolution recognizes September 20, 2025, as National LGBTQ+ Servicemembers and Veterans Day and celebrates the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer servicemembers and veterans who have served in the Armed Forces.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect the civil rights of all Americans.

The cosponsorship provides a meaningful, but narrow, advancement of a civil-rights goal: the resolution explicitly recognizes and celebrates LGBTQ+ servicemembers and veterans, regrets harm caused by discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and urges access to health care for transgender veterans and servicemembers. That supports protection of civil rights for a specific protected group. However, it is limited to a commemorative resolution and targeted protections, not a broad measure protecting the civil rights of all Americans, so the support is partial rather than direct and comprehensive.

“And because Alex believes in an America made stronger by its diversity, he’s consistently fought to protect the civil rights of all Americans.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“This resolution recognizes September 20, 2025, as National LGBTQ+ Servicemembers and Veterans Day and celebrates the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer servicemembers and veterans who have served in the Armed Forces.”
“Additionally, the resolution (1) regrets the harm done to such servicemembers and veterans under policies that discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and (2) urges the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense to ensure transgender veterans and servicemembers and their families have access to a full range of health care.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect a patient's right to travel freely between states to access care.

The stated priority is protecting a patient's right to travel freely between states to access care. The cosponsorship is for a resolution recognizing National LGBTQ+ Servicemembers and Veterans Day and urging VA/DoD to ensure transgender veterans and servicemembers and their families have access to a full range of health care. That is a related health-access issue, but it does not address interstate travel rights or state-to-state access to care, so there is no direct policy connection.

“While Republican-led state legislatures work to strip away reproductive rights, he’s also fighting to protect a patient’s right to travel freely between states to access care.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Additionally, the resolution (1) regrets the harm done to such servicemembers and veterans under policies that discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and (2) urges the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense to ensure transgender veterans and servicemembers and their families have access to a full range of health care.”

Opposing provisions

“This resolution recognizes September 20, 2025, as National LGBTQ+ Servicemembers and Veterans Day and celebrates the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer servicemembers and veterans who have served in the Armed Forces.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Ambiguous statementCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Take bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.

The stated goal is broad: 'bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.' The cosponsorship is of a resolution recognizing National LGBTQ+ Servicemembers and Veterans Day and urging access to health care for transgender veterans and servicemembers. While this reflects support for LGBTQ+ servicemembers and a related policy concern, the quotation does not specify which freedom is meant, and the resolution is mainly commemorative with an advisory health-care request rather than direct congressional protection of a clearly identified freedom. That makes the comparison too indeterminate for a scored match.

“As the radical right wing of the Supreme Court strips away the rights of Americans, Alex believes we need bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“This resolution recognizes September 20, 2025, as National LGBTQ+ Servicemembers and Veterans Day and celebrates the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer servicemembers and veterans who have served in the Armed Forces.”
“Additionally, the resolution (1) regrets the harm done to such servicemembers and veterans under policies that discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and (2) urges the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense to ensure transgender veterans and servicemembers and their families have access to a full range of health care.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“Additionally, the resolution (1) regrets the harm done to such servicemembers and veterans under policies that discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and (2) urges the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense to ensure transgender veterans and servicemembers and their families have access to a full range of health care.”
Official summary source
S 2822 · Register America to Vote Act of 2025

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.

The stated policy goal is to protect access to abortion services throughout the United States, but the cited action is cosponsorship of the Register America to Vote Act of 2025, which addresses automatic voter registration and election administration. The bill passages do not concern abortion access or any related health-service policy, so there is no direct substantive connection to the stated goal.

“As a cosponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, Alex is fighting to protect access to abortion services throughout the United States.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Register America to Vote Act of 2025 This bill provides for the automatic registration of eligible voters.”
“Specifically, the bill directs each state that has a voter registration requirement for federal elections to automatically register eligible individuals when they turn 18 years of age.”
“The bill also provides for the automatic registration of individuals through state motor vehicle authorities.”
“Individuals must be provided with an opportunity to opt out of automatic voter registration.”
“The Election Assistance Commission must make grants to states to implement these automatic voter registration programs.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Strongly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Expand and preserve voting rights.

The cosponsored bill directly advances the stated goal of expanding and preserving voting rights by creating automatic voter registration for eligible voters, including when they turn 18 and through motor vehicle authorities. This is a substantive expansion of access to voter registration, with an opt-out feature that does not negate the core rights-expanding mechanism.

“That’s why he’s spent his career fighting to expand and preserve voting rights.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Register America to Vote Act of 2025 This bill provides for the automatic registration of eligible voters.”
“Specifically, the bill directs each state that has a voter registration requirement for federal elections to automatically register eligible individuals when they turn 18 years of age.”
“The bill also provides for the automatic registration of individuals through state motor vehicle authorities.”

Opposing provisions

“Individuals must be provided with an opportunity to opt out of automatic voter registration.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Conditions or exceptions

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect the civil rights of all Americans.

The cosponsored bill would expand access to voter registration by requiring automatic registration of eligible voters, including when individuals turn 18 and through motor vehicle authorities, with an opt-out option. That meaningfully supports a civil-rights-oriented goal of protecting Americans’ ability to participate in elections, but it is narrower than a broad statement about protecting the civil rights of all Americans and does not by itself cover the full range of civil rights issues.

“And because Alex believes in an America made stronger by its diversity, he’s consistently fought to protect the civil rights of all Americans.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Register America to Vote Act of 2025 This bill provides for the automatic registration of eligible voters.”
“Specifically, the bill directs each state that has a voter registration requirement for federal elections to automatically register eligible individuals when they turn 18 years of age.”
“The bill also provides for the automatic registration of individuals through state motor vehicle authorities.”
“Individuals must be provided with an opportunity to opt out of automatic voter registration.”
“The Election Assistance Commission must make grants to states to implement these automatic voter registration programs.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope · Conditions or exceptions

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Protect a patient's right to travel freely between states to access care.

The stated policy goal is to protect a patient's right to travel between states to access care, but the cosponsored bill concerns automatic voter registration and election administration. It does not address interstate travel, patient access to care, or reproductive rights access mechanisms, so there is no direct policy connection to compare.

“While Republican-led state legislatures work to strip away reproductive rights, he’s also fighting to protect a patient’s right to travel freely between states to access care.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Register America to Vote Act of 2025 This bill provides for the automatic registration of eligible voters.”
“Specifically, the bill directs each state that has a voter registration requirement for federal elections to automatically register eligible individuals when they turn 18 years of age.”
“The bill also provides for the automatic registration of individuals through state motor vehicle authorities.”
“Individuals must be provided with an opportunity to opt out of automatic voter registration.”
“The Election Assistance Commission must make grants to states to implement these automatic voter registration programs.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Take bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.

The stated goal is broad congressional action to protect a basic freedom, and the cosponsored bill advances that goal by expanding access to vote through automatic voter registration. The bill creates an automatic registration system for eligible voters at age 18 and through motor vehicle authorities, which meaningfully supports voting access. However, it is a narrower election-administration measure rather than a direct, comprehensive response to court decisions or a broader rights-protection package, so the fit is supportive but not maximal.

“As the radical right wing of the Supreme Court strips away the rights of Americans, Alex believes we need bold action from Congress to protect one of our most basic freedoms.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Register America to Vote Act of 2025 This bill provides for the automatic registration of eligible voters.”
“Specifically, the bill directs each state that has a voter registration requirement for federal elections to automatically register eligible individuals when they turn 18 years of age.”
“The bill also provides for the automatic registration of individuals through state motor vehicle authorities.”
“The Election Assistance Commission must make grants to states to implement these automatic voter registration programs.”

Opposing provisions

“Individuals must be provided with an opportunity to opt out of automatic voter registration.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope · Conditions or exceptions

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“Specifically, the bill directs each state that has a voter registration requirement for federal elections to automatically register eligible individuals when they turn 18 years of age.”
Official summary source

Prepared Legislative Analysis

119th Congress · computed from the latest committed analytics snapshot

Updated Oct 30, 2026, 11:00 AM

Sponsored
114
Cosponsored
696
Progressed
196
Floor or later
124
Final success
87
Bill actions
2,891

Top Policy Areas

Health

104

Government Operations and Politics

69

Crime and Law Enforcement

64

Education

57

Public Lands and Natural Resources

45

Agriculture and Food

40

Armed Forces and National Security

40

Labor and Employment

37

Monthly Bill Activity

Jan 2025
105
Feb 2025
178
Mar 2025
130
Apr 2025
155
May 2025
146
Jun 2025
115
Jul 2025
142
Aug 2025
12
Sep 2025
186
Oct 2025
88
Nov 2025
62
Dec 2025
143
Jan 2026
96
Feb 2026
103
Mar 2026
152
Apr 2026
147
May 2026
211
Jun 2026
204
Jul 2026
141
Aug 2026
133
Sep 2026
230
Oct 2026
12

Terms

119th

Senate

Senator · California

2021
118th

Senate

Senator · California

2021 - 2025
117th

Senate

Senator · California

2021 - 2023

Committee Assignments

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 1,625 reports · 610 nominations · 7,981 communications

Committee on Environment and Public Works

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 437 reports · 620 nominations · 10,126 communications

Committee on Rules and Administration

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 27 reports · 108 nominations · 782 communications

Committee on the Budget

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 0 reports · 0 nominations · 0 communications

Committee on the Judiciary

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 180 reports · 5,536 nominations · 2,179 communications

Joint Committee of Congress on the Library

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 0 reports · 0 nominations · 0 communications

Joint Committee on Printing

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 0 reports · 0 nominations · 0 communications