What’s My Rep Doing

Last sync: Oct 30, 2026, 2:26 AM UTC

Members

P000145

Alex Padilla

DemocraticCaliforniaCurrent Member
Sponsored
114
Cosponsored
696
Birth Year
1973

Stated Priorities & Legislative Record

Congress 119 · Automated analysis

Reviewed comparisons point both waysAll topics

511 reviewed comparisons · 184 scored · 178 measures

Comparison balance
+1.2/ 2
Supportive
180
Mixed
3
Opposing
1
Unscored
327

Education

Sponsored
1
Cosponsored
26
Linked House votes
0

What they say Official statements

Support funding for teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.

Stated priority

“He is proud to advocate for funding to support teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.”

Alex Padilla U.S. Senator for California · Captured 2026-10-28

Make higher education accessible for all.

Stated priority

“As a first-generation college graduate, Alex knows the hurdles that too many Californians face in accessing quality, affordable higher education, and he is determined to make higher education accessible for all.”

Alex Padilla U.S. Senator for California · Captured 2026-10-28

Support STEM educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.

Stated priority

“As a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a degree in mechanical engineering, Alex is a strong supporter of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.”

Alex Padilla U.S. Senator for California · Captured 2026-10-28

What they do Legislative evidence

SRES 133 · A resolution expressing support for the local public K-12 schools of the United States and condemning any actions that would defund public education or weaken or dismantle the Department of Education.

Cosponsor

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Support funding for teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.

The cosponsored resolution meaningfully supports public school funding and the Department of Education, which aligns with the cited goal of supporting school infrastructure and, more generally, school resources. It also favors keeping federal education funding in public K-12 schools rather than diverting it elsewhere. However, the supplied text does not specifically address teachers and staff funding or student well-being programs, so the match is supportive but narrower than the full stated priority.

“He is proud to advocate for funding to support teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“This resolution supports federal investment in public K-12 schools, affirms that the Department of Education (ED) plays a vital role in the public education system, and states that public education funding should not be diverted (e.g., through the use of vouchers) to privately run K-12 schools.”
“The resolution also condemns any executive or legislative action to (1) dismantle or relocate ED or any of its major offices; or (2) reduce federal funding for public education, block federal grants for education, or transfer funding burdens for education to state and local governments.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Make higher education accessible for all.

The stated goal is to make higher education accessible for all, but the cosponsored resolution concerns local public K-12 schools and Department of Education funding/structure. It supports public education generally, yet it does not directly advance access to higher education, nor does it address college affordability, admissions, aid, or other higher-education access mechanisms.

“As a first-generation college graduate, Alex knows the hurdles that too many Californians face in accessing quality, affordable higher education, and he is determined to make higher education accessible for all.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“This resolution supports federal investment in public K-12 schools, affirms that the Department of Education (ED) plays a vital role in the public education system, and states that public education funding should not be diverted (e.g., through the use of vouchers) to privately run K-12 schools.”
“The resolution also condemns any executive or legislative action to (1) dismantle or relocate ED or any of its major offices; or (2) reduce federal funding for public education, block federal grants for education, or transfer funding burdens for education to state and local governments.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Support STEM educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.

The cosponsored resolution meaningfully supports public K-12 education and protects school funding, which can indirectly help STEM educational opportunities in school settings. However, the stated policy goal is broader and more specific: support STEM opportunities inside and outside the classroom. This resolution does not directly address STEM programming, extracurricular STEM access, teacher training, or out-of-school STEM opportunities; it is a general public-education funding and anti-defunding measure. So it is supportive but narrower than the priority.

“As a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a degree in mechanical engineering, Alex is a strong supporter of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“This resolution supports federal investment in public K-12 schools, affirms that the Department of Education (ED) plays a vital role in the public education system, and states that public education funding should not be diverted (e.g., through the use of vouchers) to privately run K-12 schools.”
“The resolution also condemns any executive or legislative action to (1) dismantle or relocate ED or any of its major offices; or (2) reduce federal funding for public education, block federal grants for education, or transfer funding burdens for education to state and local governments.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“This resolution supports federal investment in public K-12 schools, affirms that the Department of Education (ED) plays a vital role in the public education system, and states that public education funding should not be diverted (e.g., through the use of vouchers) to privately run K-12 schools.”
Official summary source
S 986 · Safe Schools Improvement Act

Cosponsor

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Support funding for teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.

The cosponsored bill would advance student well-being by requiring anti-bullying and anti-harassment policies in schools, along with notices, grievance procedures, data reporting, and program evaluation. That meaningfully supports the student well-being portion of the stated goal. However, the passage does not address funding for teachers and staff or school infrastructure, so the support is narrower than the full priority.

“He is proud to advocate for funding to support teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Safe Schools Improvement Act This bill requires states to direct their local educational agencies (LEAs) to establish policies that prevent and prohibit bullying and harassment of elementary and secondary school students.”
“Further, LEAs must provide (1) students, parents, and educational professionals with annual notice of the conduct prohibited in their disciplinary policies; (2) students and parents with grievance procedures that target such conduct; and (3) the public with annual data on the incidence and frequency of that conduct at the school and LEA level.”
“The Department of Education must conduct and report on an independent biennial evaluation of programs and policies to combat bullying and harassment in elementary and secondary schools.”
“The National Center for Education Statistics must collect state data to determine the incidence and frequency of the conduct prohibited by LEA disciplinary policies.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Make higher education accessible for all.

The stated policy goal is to make higher education accessible for all, but the cosponsored bill concerns bullying and harassment policies in elementary and secondary schools, plus reporting and evaluation on those policies. It does not directly address access to higher education, affordability, admissions, tuition, financial aid, or other college-access mechanisms. Any connection is too indirect to score as support or opposition.

“As a first-generation college graduate, Alex knows the hurdles that too many Californians face in accessing quality, affordable higher education, and he is determined to make higher education accessible for all.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Support STEM educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.

The stated policy goal is to support STEM educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom. The cosponsored bill is a Safe Schools Improvement Act focused on bullying and harassment prevention, notice, grievance procedures, data reporting, and evaluation in elementary and secondary schools. Those provisions concern school safety and anti-bullying policy, not STEM educational opportunities, so there is no direct substantive connection to the specific goal.

“As a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a degree in mechanical engineering, Alex is a strong supporter of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Safe Schools Improvement Act This bill requires states to direct their local educational agencies (LEAs) to establish policies that prevent and prohibit bullying and harassment of elementary and secondary school students.”
“In particular, these policies must prohibit bullying and harassment based on race, color, national origin, disability, religion, or sex.”
“Sex includes sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics (including intersex traits).”
“Further, LEAs must provide (1) students, parents, and educational professionals with annual notice of the conduct prohibited in their disciplinary policies; (2) students and parents with grievance procedures that target such conduct; and (3) the public with annual data on the incidence and frequency of that conduct at the school and LEA level.”
“The Department of Education must conduct and report on an independent biennial evaluation of programs and policies to combat bullying and harassment in elementary and secondary schools.”
“The National Center for Education Statistics must collect state data to determine the incidence and frequency of the conduct prohibited by LEA disciplinary policies.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“Safe Schools Improvement Act This bill requires states to direct their local educational agencies (LEAs) to establish policies that prevent and prohibit bullying and harassment of elementary and secondary school students.”
Official summary source
S 745 · Empowering Families in Special Education Act

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Support funding for teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.

The stated policy goal concerns funding for teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being. The cosponsored bill only requires schools to notify parents about the option to include additional knowledgeable individuals on a child's IEP team. That is related to special education process and parent notice, not direct funding for personnel, facilities, or general student well-being programs.

“He is proud to advocate for funding to support teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Empowering Families in Special Education Act This bill establishes a notification requirement related to an individualized education program (IEP).”
“This bill requires the LEA that serves the child to notify the child's parents of their right to include these other individuals with knowledge or special expertise on the child's IEP team.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Make higher education accessible for all.

The quoted policy goal is broad access to higher education for all, but the cosponsored bill concerns special education IEP notification rights for parents of children with disabilities. It affects participation in K-12 special education planning, not access to higher education, so there is no direct substantive connection to the stated goal.

“As a first-generation college graduate, Alex knows the hurdles that too many Californians face in accessing quality, affordable higher education, and he is determined to make higher education accessible for all.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Empowering Families in Special Education Act This bill establishes a notification requirement related to an individualized education program (IEP).”
“This bill requires the LEA that serves the child to notify the child's parents of their right to include these other individuals with knowledge or special expertise on the child's IEP team.”

Opposing provisions

“(Generally, IEPs are individualized plans to ensure that a child with a disability receives a free appropriate public education.)”
“Under current law, states and local educational agencies (LEAs) must convene a team to develop an IEP.”
“The composition of the team that develops the IEP is outlined in current law and allows for other individuals who have knowledge or special expertise regarding the child (including related services personnel, as appropriate) to participate in this team.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Support STEM educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.

The stated priority is support for STEM educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom. The cosponsored bill is about IEP notification rights for parents in special education, specifically informing them that they may include additional knowledgeable individuals on a child's IEP team. That is an education-related procedural protection, but it does not directly advance STEM education opportunities or STEM programming.

“As a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a degree in mechanical engineering, Alex is a strong supporter of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“This bill requires the LEA that serves the child to notify the child's parents of their right to include these other individuals with knowledge or special expertise on the child's IEP team.”
“The composition of the team that develops the IEP is outlined in current law and allows for other individuals who have knowledge or special expertise regarding the child (including related services personnel, as appropriate) to participate in this team.”

Opposing provisions

“Empowering Families in Special Education Act This bill establishes a notification requirement related to an individualized education program (IEP).”
“(Generally, IEPs are individualized plans to ensure that a child with a disability receives a free appropriate public education.)”
“Under current law, states and local educational agencies (LEAs) must convene a team to develop an IEP.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“This bill requires the LEA that serves the child to notify the child's parents of their right to include these other individuals with knowledge or special expertise on the child's IEP team.”
Official summary source
SRES 96 · A resolution designating the week of February 24 through February 28, 2025, as "Public Schools Week".

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Support funding for teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.

The cited action is cosponsoring a resolution that only designates a week as Public Schools Week. The supplied passage does not contain any funding provisions, appropriations, infrastructure investments, or student-well-being programs, so it does not directly advance the specific policy goal of funding teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.

“He is proud to advocate for funding to support teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Make higher education accessible for all.

The stated policy goal concerns making higher education accessible for all. The cited action is cosponsoring a resolution designating a week as Public Schools Week, which is a symbolic recognition of K-12 public schools and does not directly advance or undermine higher education access. No substantive higher-education mechanism is described in the supplied passage.

“As a first-generation college graduate, Alex knows the hurdles that too many Californians face in accessing quality, affordable higher education, and he is determined to make higher education accessible for all.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Insufficient evidenceCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Support STEM educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.

The cited action is a cosponsorship of a resolution naming Public Schools Week. The only available official summary passage says it designates a week; it does not mention STEM education, STEM programs, or support for educational opportunities inside or outside the classroom. Because the action’s policy mechanism is only ceremonial/recognitional on the supplied record, there is not enough evidence to compare it to the specific STEM-education goal.

“As a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a degree in mechanical engineering, Alex is a strong supporter of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“This resolution designates February 24-February 28, 2025, as Public Schools Week.”
Official summary source
SRES 66 · A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of "Career and Technical Education Month".

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Support funding for teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.

The cosponsored resolution is a symbolic designation of Career and Technical Education Month. It celebrates CTE generally, but the supplied summary does not show a specific funding mechanism for teachers and staff, school infrastructure, or student well-being. Because the action is only a broad resolution and not an appropriations or education-funding measure, a defensible comparison to the stated funding goal cannot be made.

“He is proud to advocate for funding to support teachers and staff, school infrastructure, and student well-being.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“This resolution supports the designation of Career and Technical Education Month to celebrate career and technical education across the United States.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Make higher education accessible for all.

The stated goal is to make higher education accessible for all. The cosponsored measure is a resolution supporting Career and Technical Education Month, which is a general celebration of career and technical education. The provided passage does not show any specific policy mechanism expanding access to higher education, lowering college costs, or improving college availability, so the connection is too indirect to score as support or opposition.

“As a first-generation college graduate, Alex knows the hurdles that too many Californians face in accessing quality, affordable higher education, and he is determined to make higher education accessible for all.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Support STEM educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.

The stated goal is support for STEM educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom, but the only official passage describes a resolution supporting the designation of Career and Technical Education Month. That is a broad celebration of career and technical education, not a direct policy mechanism advancing STEM educational opportunities specifically, and the supplied summary does not show any concrete programmatic support or classroom/out-of-classroom STEM access. Because the connection is too indirect and the topic scope is narrower/different, a scored comparison is not defensible.

“As a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a degree in mechanical engineering, Alex is a strong supporter of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) educational opportunities inside and outside the classroom.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“This resolution supports the designation of Career and Technical Education Month to celebrate career and technical education across the United States.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“This resolution supports the designation of Career and Technical Education Month to celebrate career and technical education across the United States.”
Official summary source

Prepared Legislative Analysis

119th Congress · computed from the latest committed analytics snapshot

Updated Oct 29, 2026, 11:00 AM

Sponsored
114
Cosponsored
696
Progressed
196
Floor or later
124
Final success
87
Bill actions
2,891

Top Policy Areas

Health

104

Government Operations and Politics

69

Crime and Law Enforcement

64

Education

57

Public Lands and Natural Resources

45

Agriculture and Food

40

Armed Forces and National Security

40

Labor and Employment

37

Monthly Bill Activity

Jan 2025
105
Feb 2025
178
Mar 2025
130
Apr 2025
155
May 2025
146
Jun 2025
115
Jul 2025
142
Aug 2025
12
Sep 2025
186
Oct 2025
88
Nov 2025
62
Dec 2025
143
Jan 2026
96
Feb 2026
103
Mar 2026
152
Apr 2026
147
May 2026
211
Jun 2026
204
Jul 2026
141
Aug 2026
133
Sep 2026
230
Oct 2026
12

Terms

119th

Senate

Senator · California

2021
118th

Senate

Senator · California

2021 - 2025
117th

Senate

Senator · California

2021 - 2023

Committee Assignments

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 1,625 reports · 610 nominations · 7,981 communications

Committee on Environment and Public Works

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 437 reports · 620 nominations · 10,126 communications

Committee on Rules and Administration

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 27 reports · 108 nominations · 782 communications

Committee on the Budget

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 0 reports · 0 nominations · 0 communications

Committee on the Judiciary

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 180 reports · 5,536 nominations · 2,179 communications

Joint Committee of Congress on the Library

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 0 reports · 0 nominations · 0 communications

Joint Committee on Printing

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 0 reports · 0 nominations · 0 communications