What’s My Rep Doing

Last sync: Oct 30, 2026, 5:17 AM UTC

Members

P000145

Alex Padilla

DemocraticCaliforniaCurrent Member
Sponsored
114
Cosponsored
696
Birth Year
1973

Stated Priorities & Legislative Record

Congress 119 · Automated analysis

Reviewed comparisons point both waysAll topics

511 reviewed comparisons · 184 scored · 178 measures

Comparison balance
+1.2/ 2
Supportive
180
Mixed
3
Opposing
1
Unscored
327

Law and Crime

Sponsored
2
Cosponsored
42
Linked House votes
0

What they say Official statements

Expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms.

Stated priority

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Alex Padilla U.S. Senator for California · Captured 2026-10-28

Banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.

Stated priority

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Alex Padilla U.S. Senator for California · Captured 2026-10-28

What they do Legislative evidence

SRES 149 · A resolution designating April 2025 as "Second Chance Month".

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms.

The stated policy goal is expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms. The cosponsorship action is a resolution designating April 2025 as Second Chance Month, which concerns awareness of barriers affecting people with criminal records and does not address firearms background checks or gun sale/transfer policy. Any connection is too indirect to score as support or opposition.

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.

The stated policy goal is banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. The cited action is cosponsoring a resolution designating April 2025 as Second Chance Month, which concerns awareness of barriers for people with criminal records. That resolution does not address firearms policy or any mechanism related to assault weapons or magazine bans, so there is no direct substantive connection to compare.

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“This resolution designates April 2025 as Second Chance Month to promote awareness of unnecessary legal and social barriers that prevent individuals with criminal records from becoming productive members of society.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“This resolution designates April 2025 as Second Chance Month to promote awareness of unnecessary legal and social barriers that prevent individuals with criminal records from becoming productive members of society.”
Official summary source
S 1466 · Resources for Victims of Gun Violence Act of 2025

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms.

The stated policy goal is expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms. The cosponsored bill, based on the official summary, establishes an advisory council to support victims of gun violence and assess their needs. That is a victim-services measure, not a background-check expansion, so there is no direct substantive connection to the specific policy goal.

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Resources for Victims of Gun Violence Act of 2025 This bill establishes the Advisory Council to Support Victims of Gun Violence.”
“Among other things, the advisory council must assess the needs of victims of gun violence and disseminate information about helpful resources.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.

The stated policy goal is banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines. The cited action is cosponsorship of a bill that establishes an advisory council to support victims of gun violence and disseminate resources. That is a gun-violence victim support measure, not a restriction on firearm types or magazine capacity, so it does not directly advance the specific policy goal.

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Resources for Victims of Gun Violence Act of 2025 This bill establishes the Advisory Council to Support Victims of Gun Violence.”
“Among other things, the advisory council must assess the needs of victims of gun violence and disseminate information about helpful resources.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“Resources for Victims of Gun Violence Act of 2025 This bill establishes the Advisory Council to Support Victims of Gun Violence.”
Official summary source
S 1370 · GOSAFE Act

Cosponsor

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms.

The cited policy goal is expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms. The GOSAFE Act cosponsorship does not address background checks directly, but it does meaningfully regulate the sale and transfer of certain firearms and large-capacity ammunition feeding devices, including prohibitions on sale, transfer, and receipt of covered items. That is a narrower, partial advance toward tighter firearm transfer controls, but it is not the same as expanding background checks for all firearms.

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Gas-Operated Semi-Automatic Firearms Exclusion Act or the GOSAFE Act This bill establishes a framework to regulate gas-operated semiautomatic firearms and large capacity ammunition feeding devices under federal firearms laws.”
“First, the bill generally prohibits the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, receipt, or possession of a firearm that is or is modified to operate as a prohibited gas-operated semiautomatic firearm; a combination of parts that modify or can be assembled into a prohibited gas-operated semiautomatic firearm, or that produce an unlawful gas-operated semiautomatic cycling action; a device or combination of parts designed to materially increase the rate of fire of a semiautomatic firearm; or a firearm that is modified to materially increase the rate of fire.”
“Second, the bill generally prohibits (1) the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or receipt of a large capacity ammunition feeding device; or (2) the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of enactment.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

Strongly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.

The stated policy goal is to ban military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines. The GOSAFE Act broadly prohibits the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, receipt, and in some cases possession of gas-operated semiautomatic firearms, and it also generally prohibits large capacity ammunition feeding devices. That is a direct substantive advancement of the firearms-ban portion of the goal, even though the bill’s terminology is broader and focused on gas-operated semiautomatic firearms rather than using the exact phrase 'military-style assault weapons.'

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Gas-Operated Semi-Automatic Firearms Exclusion Act or the GOSAFE Act This bill establishes a framework to regulate gas-operated semiautomatic firearms and large capacity ammunition feeding devices under federal firearms laws.”
“First, the bill generally prohibits the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, receipt, or possession of a firearm that is or is modified to operate as a prohibited gas-operated semiautomatic firearm; a combination of parts that modify or can be assembled into a prohibited gas-operated semiautomatic firearm, or that produce an unlawful gas-operated semiautomatic cycling action; a device or combination of parts designed to materially increase the rate of fire of a semiautomatic firearm; or a firearm that is modified to materially increase the rate of fire.”
“Second, the bill generally prohibits (1) the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or receipt of a large capacity ammunition feeding device; or (2) the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of enactment.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“A violation is subject to criminal penalties—a fine, a prison term of up to 12 months, or both, for each violation.”
Official summary source
S 1374 · BUMP Act

Cosponsor

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms.

The stated policy goal is expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms. The cosponsored bill instead concerns restrictions on machinegun parts and certain modified semiautomatic firearms under the National Firearms Act. It does not add a background-check requirement for all firearm sales or transfers, so the action is not a direct substantive match to the specific goal.

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Banning Unlawful Machinegun Parts Act or the BUMP Act This bill generally prohibits the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, receipt, or possession of a device that is primarily designed, or redesigned, to increase the rate of fire when attached to a semiautomatic firearm; a device, part, or combination of parts that is designed and functions to increase the rate of fire of a firearm; or a semiautomatic firearm that has been modified to materially increase the rate of fire or to approximate the action or rate of fire of a machine gun.”
“Additionally, the bill adds to the list of firearms subject to regulation under the National Firearms Act semiautomatic firearms that have been modified to materially increase the rate of fire or approximate the action or rate of fire of a machine gun.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.

The stated priority is to ban military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines. The cosponsored BUMP Act instead targets bump stocks and certain semiautomatic firearms modified to increase rate of fire or approximate a machine gun. That is related gun regulation, but it does not directly ban assault weapons or high-capacity magazines, so the connection is too indirect for a reliable support rating.

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Banning Unlawful Machinegun Parts Act or the BUMP Act This bill generally prohibits the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, receipt, or possession of a device that is primarily designed, or redesigned, to increase the rate of fire when attached to a semiautomatic firearm; a device, part, or combination of parts that is designed and functions to increase the rate of fire of a firearm; or a semiautomatic firearm that has been modified to materially increase the rate of fire or to approximate the action or rate of fire of a machine gun.”
“Additionally, the bill adds to the list of firearms subject to regulation under the National Firearms Act semiautomatic firearms that have been modified to materially increase the rate of fire or approximate the action or rate of fire of a machine gun.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“Banning Unlawful Machinegun Parts Act or the BUMP Act This bill generally prohibits the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, receipt, or possession of a device that is primarily designed, or redesigned, to increase the rate of fire when attached to a semiautomatic firearm; a device, part, or combination of parts that is designed and functions to increase the rate of fire of a firearm; or a semiautomatic firearm that has been modified to materially increase the rate of fire or to approximate the action or rate of fire of a machine gun.”
Official summary source
S 1294 · Federal Firearm Licensee Act

Cosponsor

Partly supportsCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms.

The stated goal is to expand background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms. The cosponsored bill meaningfully advances background-check related screening by requiring federally licensed firearms dealers to initiate firearms-related background checks for employees and to notify ATF about default-proceed firearm transfers when a background check is incomplete. However, the bill is limited to federally licensed dealers and related compliance/reporting rules; it does not expand background checks to all firearm sales or transfers generally. So it partially supports the policy goal, but more narrowly than the quotation states.

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Supporting provisions

“Specifically, bill requires FFLs to implement and comply with a plan to secure their business premises, conduct quarterly physical checks of their business inventories, maintain video surveillance of the area where firearms are sold or transferred, and initiate firearms-related background checks for employees.”
“Additionally, the bill requires FFLs to report to the ATF any inventory firearm that is lost, stolen, or unaccounted for and to notify the ATF about default-proceed transactions (i.e., allowable firearm transfers to an unlicensed person prior to the completion of a background check when the submitted background check remains incomplete after three business days).”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

No direct connectionCosponsorship · Reviewed automated analysis

Compared with: Banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.

The stated policy goal is to ban military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. The cosponsored bill instead focuses on federal firearms licensee security, recordkeeping, inspections, reporting, and ATF enforcement authority. It does not prohibit any category of firearms or magazines, so there is no direct substantive connection to the specific ban sought.

“However, Alex believes there is still far more to do—including expanding background checks for the sale or transfer of all firearms and banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Official statement · Captured 2026-10-28

Opposing provisions

“Federal Firearm Licensee Act This bill establishes new security requirements and expands recordkeeping and reporting requirements for federally licensed dealers, importers, and manufacturers of firearms (i.e., federal firearms licensees, or FFLs).”
“The bill also broadens the authority of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to administer federal firearms laws and enforce violations.”
“Specifically, bill requires FFLs to implement and comply with a plan to secure their business premises, conduct quarterly physical checks of their business inventories, maintain video surveillance of the area where firearms are sold or transferred, and initiate firearms-related background checks for employees.”
“Additionally, the bill requires FFLs to report to the ATF any inventory firearm that is lost, stolen, or unaccounted for and to notify the ATF about default-proceed transactions (i.e., allowable firearm transfers to an unlicensed person prior to the completion of a background check when the submitted background check remains incomplete after three business days).”
“Finally, the bill removes limits on the ATF's authority to conduct activities related to the administration of federal firearms laws.”
“It enhances the ATF's inspection authority, including by removing the limit on the number of annual compliance inspections (currently, one), requiring inspections of high-risk FFLs, and authorizing an additional 650 investigators.”
Official legislative summary

Summary-based analysis · Action predates captured statement · Narrower scope

Assessed 2026-10-28 · Review: User-authorized automated publication. Published at the user request after the bounded production backfill. Automated evidence validation passed; comparisons have not been individually audited.

“The bill also broadens the authority of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to administer federal firearms laws and enforce violations.”
Official summary source

Prepared Legislative Analysis

119th Congress · computed from the latest committed analytics snapshot

Updated Oct 29, 2026, 11:00 AM

Sponsored
114
Cosponsored
696
Progressed
196
Floor or later
124
Final success
87
Bill actions
2,891

Top Policy Areas

Health

104

Government Operations and Politics

69

Crime and Law Enforcement

64

Education

57

Public Lands and Natural Resources

45

Agriculture and Food

40

Armed Forces and National Security

40

Labor and Employment

37

Monthly Bill Activity

Jan 2025
105
Feb 2025
178
Mar 2025
130
Apr 2025
155
May 2025
146
Jun 2025
115
Jul 2025
142
Aug 2025
12
Sep 2025
186
Oct 2025
88
Nov 2025
62
Dec 2025
143
Jan 2026
96
Feb 2026
103
Mar 2026
152
Apr 2026
147
May 2026
211
Jun 2026
204
Jul 2026
141
Aug 2026
133
Sep 2026
230
Oct 2026
12

Terms

119th

Senate

Senator · California

2021
118th

Senate

Senator · California

2021 - 2025
117th

Senate

Senator · California

2021 - 2023

Committee Assignments

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 1,625 reports · 610 nominations · 7,981 communications

Committee on Environment and Public Works

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 437 reports · 620 nominations · 10,126 communications

Committee on Rules and Administration

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 27 reports · 108 nominations · 782 communications

Committee on the Budget

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 0 reports · 0 nominations · 0 communications

Committee on the Judiciary

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 180 reports · 5,536 nominations · 2,179 communications

Joint Committee of Congress on the Library

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 0 reports · 0 nominations · 0 communications

Joint Committee on Printing

Member · Senate.gov

0 bills · 0 reports · 0 nominations · 0 communications